Filter by:
Inquiry
Document Numbers
Date Range
to
Applied Filters:
Sort: Wai number (descending)
28 Mar 2024
Size: 562KB
3.1.037
Pre hearing Represented - Party Submission/Memo

Ā Ngāpō, Memorandum of counsel filing submissions of the upcoming judicial conference, 2 Apr 24

the Oranga Tamariki (section 7AA) Urgent Inquiry

03 Apr 2024
Size: 475KB
3.2.004
Hearing - Party Submission/Memo

R Smail / S Cassidy (Wai 2941), Memorandum of counsel in support of the claimants, 19 Apr 24

the Oranga Tamariki (section 7AA) Urgent Inquiry

19 Apr 2024
Size: 484KB
A001
Other Document

Affidavit of Verna Te Roha Gate, 31 Jan 24
(also recorded as Wai 3309, #A1)

the Oranga Tamariki (section 7AA) Urgent Inquiry

28 Mar 2024
Size: 2.44MB
Oranga Tamariki Urgent PP
Report

The Oranga Tamariki (Section 7AA) Urgent Inquiry Report

the Oranga Tamariki (section 7AA) Urgent Inquiry

On 29 April 2025, The Tribunal issued an interim report, The Oranga Tamariki (Section 7AA) Urgent Inquiry Report, in pre-publication form.

The report concerns claims submitted to the Tribunal under urgency regarding the Crown’s policy to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989. Section 7AA imposes specific duties on the chief executive of Oranga Tamariki so as to provide a practical commitment to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi

A key policy objective of section 7AA was to reduce the disproportionate number of Māori entering into care and to improve outcomes for those tamariki already in care. Under section 7AA, iwi or Māori organisations may enter into strategic partnerships with the chief executive. There are 10 strategic partnership agreements under section 7AA currently in place, as well as nine relationships with post-settlement governance entities, some of whom are also strategic partners.

The claimants and interested parties argued that the repeal of section 7AA and the absence of consultation with Māori and the Crown’s strategic partners breached the Crown’s Treaty duties.

Because of its interim status, the report contains no findings or recommendations but it raises three matters for the government’s consideration:

  • the Tribunal’s concern that the government’s singular focus on the implementation of a commitment made in one of the coalition agreements has caused it to disregard its obligations under the Treaty;
  • the Tribunal’s concern that the rushed repeal of section 7AA will cause actual harm; and
  • the availability of a more principled way forward under section 448B of the Act.

The panel comprised Judge Michael Doogan (presiding), Kim Ngarimu, and Tā William Te Rangiua (Pou) Temara.

 

29 Apr 2024
Size: 1.54MB
24 Apr 2024
Size: 487KB
1 ... 57 58 59 ... 6929